Multiple Choice test discriminated against candidate
Category: Industry News, disability, Discrimination, Recruitment, Accessibility, diversity inclusion, Government
TheEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has disallowed an appeal by the Government Legal Service (GLS) against a Tribunal judgement which claimed that its exercise of asking job applicants to complete a multiple choice assessment was discriminatory.
Terri Brookes was asked to take the multiple-choice test as part of the first stage of her application to the Government Legal Service (GLS), whose recruitment process is infamously competitive. Brookes, who has Asperger's Syndrome, reasoned that permitting applicants with an Autistic Spectrum Condition to use short written answers would be a fair and sensible modification, as the wrong or right character of pre-scripted answers left her in an unfavourable circumstance that reduced her chance of success. However, the GLS vetoed this, contending that even if it was possible to attest that the multiple choice questions hindered the chances of candidates with an Autistic Spectrum Condition, the testing was a fair process of evaluating candidates.
Both the original employment tribunal and the EAT found the GLS' stance to be inappropriate. Whilst they recognized that the testing served a genuine resolve to make the recruitment process more efficient, the procedures were fundamentally disproportionate to the desired outcome. The courts found that GLS had indirectly discriminated against the candidate, had been unsuccessful at making reasonable adjustments that took into account her disability, and had treated her adversely.
Emma O’Leary, employment lawyer at Employment Law Advisory Services, called it a “significant case for HR” because psychometric testing methods were predominant across all industries. O’Leary said employers needed to make sure they could prove that their recruitment processes were a “proportionate means” of achieving a legitimate aim, particularly if their practices were likely to put a particular group at a disadvantage.
Karen Jackson, managing director at discrimination specialist law firm didlaw, added: “The case shows the dangers of rigid thinking by employers when considering reasonable adjustments during recruitment. Flexibility and a willingness to find solutions are essential in avoiding unlawful discrimination.”
This ruling, which is one of the first at EAT to uphold a judgement of indirect disability discrimination, offers a clear sign to employers of the necessity to take into account reasonable adjustments, as well as the limitations of psychometric testing in relation to neurodiversity, especially where that neurodiversity may be a Protected Characteristic. Employers are now urged to reassess their recruitment practices.
VERCIDA work with over one hundred clients who are committed to creating an inclusive work environment, which includes the embracing of those with mental health conditions. If you are an employer and interested in working with VERCIDA to promote your diversity and inclusion initiatives and attract the best candidates, please call 02037405973 or email info@VERCIDA.com for more information.
We are also officially recommended by Disability Confident as a step on achieving Employer status, please click herefor more information.
VERCIDA works with over one hundred clients who are committed to creating an inclusive work
environment. If you are an employer and interested in working with VERCIDA to promote your
diversity and inclusion initiatives and attract the best candidates, please email
firstname.lastname@example.org for more information.
Did you know that users who have filled in their profile details are 42 times more likely to get matched with the right employer?
Help us find the best workplace for you by sharing more about yourself.
We will never disclose your information with others.
Situational judgement test indirectly discriminated against candidate
The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has disallowed an appeal by the Government Legal Service (GLS) against a Tribunal judgement which claimed that its exercise of asking job applicants to complete a...
VERCIDA gets top-level government recognition for leading on disability employment
Inclusive employment experts, VERCIDA, have been awarded the highest level of government recognition for their leadership in attracting, recruiting, retaining and promoting persons with disabilities....
Recite Me & Guidant Group create digital inclusion guide for recruiters
Recruiters can now learn how to make their recruitment process more accessible for disabled jobseekers thanks to a new guide, produced in collaboration between Recite Me and Guidant Group.
Recruiters are looking for unique candidates - those individuals who have the leadership and experience to flourish in a job role. Being from a "non-traditional" background can be an advantage in this...